منابع مشابه
Hypothetico-Deductive Confirmation
Hypothetico-deductive (H-D) confirmation builds on the idea that confirming evidence consists of successful predictions that deductively follow from the hypothesis under test. This article reviews scope, history and recent development of the venerable H-D account: First, we motivate the approach and clarify its relationship to Bayesian confirmation theory. Second, we explain and discuss the tac...
متن کاملA Synthesis of Hempelian and Hypothetico-Deductive Confirmation
This paper synthesizes confirmation by instances and confirmation by successful predictions, and thereby the Hempelian and the hypotheticodeductive traditions in confirmation theory. Our merger of these two approaches solves classical problems such as the tacking paradoxes and the raven paradox and is subsequently extended to the piecemeal confirmation of entire theories. We compare our proposa...
متن کاملThe Generality of Hypothetico-Deductive Reasoning: Making Scientific Thinking Explicit
LEWIS (1988) made the case that today’s biology is essentially hypothetico-deductive in nature. In Lewis’s view, biology is not a science in which one gathers all the facts, classifies them and then somehow crystallizes them into theory. In Lewis’s words, ‘‘This erroneous view of method plus the absence of a proper definition of theory misguided my early development in science’’ (p. 362). The f...
متن کاملReconstruction of past Events from Memory: an Alternative to the Hypothetico-deductive (h-d) Method
According to the demand of the Hypothetico-Deductive (H-D) method, a theory is confirmed when the prediction-observation (p-o) gap is small and disconfirmed when the gap is large. A major goal of this paper is to introduce a research domain for which this demand does not hold. In contrast to the H-D method’s demand, this research, called the Catch model for reconstructing a face previously seen...
متن کاملPopper and Hypothetico-deductivism
Popper famously declared that induction is a myth. This thesis, if true, makes nonsense of the current volume. But is the thesis true? And, before we get to that, what precisely does it mean? Popper is a deductivist. He thinks that whenever we reason, we reason deductively or are best reconstructed as reasoning deductively. Most philosophers disagree. Most philosophers think that most reasoning...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Philosophy Compass
سال: 2011
ISSN: 1747-9991
DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2011.00409.x